Comments (45)

  1. Breakthrough Initiatives:

    RE:
    "Dec 07, 2016 08:10 michael.million@sky.com Posted on: Centauri Dreams"

    Answer:
    Thank you for all your help in this effort. It is obvious that you care about and think a great deal about these challenges. Our mandate is for the trip time to be on the order of 20 years. So that it can be reasonable to believe that the folks that work on the project will be alive when the information from the planet is returned. This drives us to a higher velocity and to the lower mass.

    - Pete Klupar, Breakthrough Starshot

  2. michael.million@sky.com:

    'Thank you for all your help in this effort. It is obvious that you care about and think a great deal about these challenges. Our mandate is for the trip time to be on the order of 20 years. So that it can be reasonable to believe that the folks that work on the project will be alive when the information from the planet is returned. This drives us to a higher velocity and to the lower mass.'

    Thanks for the site to put ideas on, there are a lot of people out there who care, I am just one of many and it is a pleasure to help in any way we can.

  3. morekenlouise@yahoo.co.jp:

    Now, we have already developed brand-new unique space propulsion effective (repetitive useful) devices of the following website,
    which could have exerted incomparably greater power than a thrust force of Ion engine and so on.

    http://www.aerospace-universe.com/NEW-STARSHIP/super-power-drive.html

    So, just in case of using the above spacecraft special devices for mainly Breakthrough Starshot、
    probably, it will take only five (or six) years at most (not at least) practically to reach Alpha Centauri and over....,
    (***Can you point out any mistakes about this matter as soon as possible?)

    According to a main concept of my spacecraft propulsion system theory,
    it'll be able to reach the existing planet Proxima b (within 5 or 6 years only) with a manned mega-spaceship just like Starship of Star Trek, of course, not that unmanned Starchip etc...

    You may ask honorable Stephen Hawking and/or Freeman Dyson and the like immediately,
    if you think that it is all false about the space propulsion system theory (see it in the above website),
    even though it has not been denied by NASA (Glenn Research Center) and the other research institutes etc at all.  
     
    We would like you to utilise these spacecraft devices (tentatively) by all means for a major breakthrough in new space technological revolutionary innovation and would appreciate it if you could comprehend the above important matter for earlier realization of all human long dreams....

    Sincerely,

    AeroSpace Universe Corp.
    info@aerospace-universe.com
    mail@aerospace-universe.com

  4. Breakthrough Initiatives:

    RE:
    "Jan 26, 2017 08:18 morekenlouise@yahoo.co.jp Posted on: Breakthrough Initiatives"

    Answer:
    Thanks for your input and help. This is a very challenging project and will require help from a diversity of people. I am afraid that I do not understand how the engines you propose work. Or what the efficiencies of these engines are. I am probably wrong but from the graphics on your website they appear to defy they law of conservation of momentum. If you could provide some more demonstrations that show more than one cycle I would appreciate it.

    - Pete Klupar, Breakthrough Starshot

  5. morekenlouise@yahoo.co.jp:

    Thanks for your answer.

    Could you point out any mistakes to be more specific from the graphics on my website they appear to defy???...., as soon as possible, before our providing some more demonstrations?

    Kingo
    AeroSpace Universe Corp.
    info@aerospace-universe.com
    mail@aerospace-universe.com

Please sign in to be able to add new comments.